IN
2012, almost 1,196,765 tourists visited Uganda compared to 1,151,356 in 2011.
This number represents an increase of almost 4% over the previous year.
Tourism brought US$834m into the economy in 2012 compared to
US$805m in 2011. It is presumed that overall, each visitor to Uganda spends
about US$800 per visit thus representing 4% of total GDP. Tourism’s total
contribution to GDP which incorporates indirect and induced imports stood at
US$1.7 billion in 2011 which was equivalent to 9% of total Ugandan GDP with
corresponding figures for Rwanda, Tanzania and Kenya being 8.4%, 13.3% and
13.7% respectively.
The writer says Efforts must be made to increase funding to the
sector if Uganda is to remain relevant in the tourist trade
This is an indication that the tourism industry is not only
continuing to grow but is also now recognized at the highest level for its
significant impact on the Ugandan economy albeit the continued meagre funding.
Regionally, Kenya is Uganda’s number one Tourist Market with
383,369 visitors, followed by Rwanda with 256,004, Tanzania 79,795, Sudan
43,258 and DRC with 42,258 visitors. On the international front 55,912 visitors
came from USA, 42,508 from United Kingdom, 24,849 from India, Germany 11,701,
while 10,186 came from Canada, 8,275 from Netherlands; 8,645 from China, Italy
6,732; Sweden 5,866 and 5,094 from Belgium.
Of the 1,196,765 who visited Uganda last year, only 182,149 were
able to visit our National Parks as compared to the 207,994 that visited the
parks in 2011. Obviously even these numbers are contestable as there is a
margin of error through double counting where on many occassions some tourists
have been counted as different people yet it is the same tourist visiting a
number of national parks.
In as much as the above statistics have made government identify
the tourism industry as one of its key priority economic sectors, there is
little to show from its input. From Hon. Maria Kiwanuka’ s proposed budget for
financial years 2013 / 2014, it is evident that government continues to
deliberately under fund tourism. Efforts must be made to increase funding to
the sector if Uganda is to remain relevant in the tourist trade. Government
continues to behave like a herdsman that keeps milking his cows without feeding
them. What would you expect from such a cow? It is surely not enough for
government to say so much about tourism and the economy’s growth without making
something tangible for it to prosper in real terms.
While the 2013-14 Budget contained some benefits for tourism these
were tempered by a combination of tax increases and omissions that represent a
missed opportunity for the industry as a whole.
In rural Uganda where the road network is still very poor,
services are not up to international standards, Electricity and water not
readily available one would ask is there any value addition. Why is government
adding 18%VAT on up country accommodation well knowing this will make it
difficult for tour operators to attract tourists and quality labor to employ in
such remote places? Until some of these issues are solved, we feel that a value
added tax is not applicable to these investments.
Tour operators
normally sign contracts with foreign wholesalers (tour operators) for a period
ranging from one to two years and others three years. The contract rates are
agreed upon normally to run from 1st January – 31st December of every year.
Based on this information, the foreign tour operators make expensive brochures
and undertake very expensive marketing strategies to market our packages. To
many, Uganda is still a blank page out there. Many a time we the tour operators
(Uganda’s un paid Ambassadors) spend a lot of our money traveling all over the
world marketing Uganda as a prime destination. It is important that government
recognizes our efforts and realizes the fact that we are still struggling to
get tourists and as such cannot afford to be perceived as expensive.
In South Africa VAT is reclaimed at the point of departure. In
Kenya and Tanzania they have also rejected the proposed 18% VAT. It’s also
important to note that these countries have huge budgets for marketing tourism
which we don’t enjoy. How will we compete if our products are more
expensive? Our humble request is that these efforts are recognized and
the government suspends the issue of VAT on hotel accommodation upcountry for
now. Up country hotels do charge VAT on the food and drinks they serve any way.
An additional 18% VAT on accommodation will be unrealistic from a business
point of view. Why implement the tax in the middle of the year?
As a country, we stand to lose our tourism market share if this
VAT is implemented in this manner. It has cost us a lot of money to capture
this market and we are not sure we can recapture it that easily once it’s lost.
Government can choose to be a little greedy but eventually lose even what you
had planned to achieve.
Over the weekend, I met Mr Silajji Kanyesigye, the Manager Medium
Taxpayer’s / Domestic Taxes Department who told me he was working on behalf of
the Ministry of Finance to better understand the implication of this 18% VAT on
up country accommodation. I took him through the costing and showed him how
this tax is causing tour operators a loss ranging from 3 – 9%. He concurred
with me and assured me that he was to present his findings to the Ministry of
Finance.
I told him if government continues with this, we expect tour
prices to increase due to the cascading effect of the 18%VAT tax increase on up
country accommodation resulting in an adverse impact on the travel and tourismindustry as a whole. The increase in tax will not only make Uganda
noncompetitive as compared to countries like Tanzania, Kenya, Rwanda and South
Africa but will also show inconsistency and breach of contract from our international
whole salers perspective.
This tax increase is one of the worst business decisions. When the
whole world including Kenya, South Africa, Tanzania, Rwanda are inviting
tourists to their country to fight slowdown in their economies, we are making
ourselves less competitive with burden of taxes on Tourism sector. I wish our
government would realise sooner the importance of tourism. The Tourism Sector
worldwide is Zero rated since they already pay VAT on fuel, beverages, park
fees, permits to mention but afew. Tanzania one of the East African countries
did introduce the same 18% tax on accommodation but later scrapped it after the
key players in the tourism fraternity realized the damage this could bring to
their economy.
While we recognize the budgetary need for additional funds by
government and for all to contribute, it is our hope that other sources can be
found that will not damage this vital sector of Uganda’s economy and diminish
its ties to the international community. Government tax incentives need to be
maintained for another 10 years so as to be able to stimulate investment in
rural areas or alternatively withhold it for the next 2 years until contracts
already signed expire. Tax incentives for up country accommodation are partly
the reason why several hotels sprung up in the rural areas. If we are to reap
the benefits, this move needs to be sustained until there are more investments
and those that are there have recovered their investment capital.
By Bruce Amp